Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Coach Co. v. . Lee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1940PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1ConcurrenceBarnhill, J.

STACY, C. J., and WINBORNE, J., join concurring opinion. This is an action for actionable negligence, brought by plaintiff against Clyde Lee and Berry B. Freeman, administrator of the estate of Andrew Freeman, deceased, to recover the sum of $250.00 for alleged damage to plaintiff's bus. The defendant Clyde Lee, who owned the automobile involved in the wreck, denied negligence and set up a counterclaim for $250.00 damage to his car. Plaintiff in reply denied the allegations of Clyde Lee. Berry B. Freeman, the administrator of the estate of Andrew Freeman, denied negligence and set up a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. . SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  2. Shirley v. . AyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Skyland Hosiery Co. v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Russell v. Windsor Steamboat Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. Brown v. . Montgomery Ward Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Howerton v. Arai Helmet, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Graham v. North Carolina Butane Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Crocker v. RoethlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API