Legal Opinion
Lewis v. AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 17, 1988No. Civ. HM-80-2733, HM-83-1399PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HERBERT F. MURRAY, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Presently before the Court is the motion of the defendant AT & T Technologies, Inc. (“AT & T”), for summary judgment against the plaintiffs in Civil No. HM-83-1399, David Conolly and Samuel Lamont Turner. Civil No. HM-83-1399 has previously been consolidated with Civil No. HM-80-2733, in which Conolly and Turner were also plain tiffs. For simplicity’s sake, Civil No. HM-80-2733 shall hereinafter be referred to as “Conolly I” and Civil No. HM-83-1399 shall be referred to as “Conolly II.”
The Court has considered AT & T’s…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Diamond v. T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1994
- Parrott v. CheneyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1989
- Rudolph v. Hechinger Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1995