Legal Opinion
Parrott v. Cheney
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 7, 1989No. Civ. H-88-3486PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ALEXANDER HARVEY, II, Chief Judge.
Presently pending before the Court in this civil action is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff, a black male, has instituted this suit against his employer, the United States Department of Defense, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., claiming racial and sex discrimination and retaliation. Following the entry of a Scheduling Order and the completion of discovery by the parties, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, contending, inter alia, that plaintiff has failed to establish a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Scarborough v. NatsiosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Hastie v. HendersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Garrett v. LujanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Batson v. PowellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Ecklund v. Fuisz Technology, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.