Legal Opinion

Rudolph v. Hechinger Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided April 27, 1995No. Civ. A. PJM 93-2719PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MESSITTE, District Judge.

I

This is another ease, of a type seen with increasing frequency in federal courts, in which an employee seeks to transform arguably harsh treatment by an employer into a claim of statutory discrimination. Beyond pure speculation, however, the evidence in no way suggests that the employer’s actions were unlawfully discriminatory, a burden of proof which the employee ultimately bears. Plaintiff Carol Rudolph has brought this suit against her former employer Hechinger Company, alleging discrimination on the basis of sex and pregnancy, in violation in Title VII of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mentch v. Eastern Savings Bank, FSBDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
  2. In Re: CARNEGIE CENTER ASSOCIATES, Debtor. Deborah RHETT, Appellant, v. CARNEGIE CENTER ASSOCIATESCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. Ferguson v. Waffle House, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2014
  4. Sado v. Leland Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  5. Marshall v. AT & T MOBILITYDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API