Kesner v. Superior Court of Alameda County
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LIU, J.
These two cases ask whether employers or landowners owe a duty of care to prevent secondary exposure to asbestos. Such exposure, sometimes called domestic or take-home exposure, occurs when a worker who is directly exposed to a toxin carries it home on his or her person or clothing, and a household member is in turn exposed through physical proximity or contact with that worker or the worker’s clothing. Plaintiffs in these actions for personal injury and wrongful death allege that take-home exposure to asbestos was a contributing cause to the deaths of Lynne Haver and Johnny…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- The Regents of the University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Ramsey v. Georgia Southern University Advanced Development CtrSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
- T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- S. Cal. Gas Co. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.(In Re S. Cal. Gas Leak Cases)California Supreme Court · 2019
- Ernest Quiroz Et Ux v. Alcoa IncArizona Supreme Court · 2018
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.