Legal Opinion
Mantzoros v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 6, 1948No. Civ. No. 13475; Civ. No. 13496PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
In these two cases (consolidated on appeal for briefs, arguments and decision) the State Board of Equalization appeals from two orders directing the issuance of peremptory writs of mandate.
The order in the Wilkinson case directs the board and its members to refrain from imposing any sentence, suspension or penalty on petitioners. The petition shows that on December 12, 1946, the board made an order suspending petitioner’s license for 15 days because of violation of section 59.6 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act [Stats. 1945, p. 1474 ; 2 DBering’s Gen. Laws, Act 3796] by serving persons on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- In Re BlaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Mudd v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Kaiser v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Ex Parte GerinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Cornell v. ReillyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Mercurio v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- San Joaquin County Employees' Ass'n v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Swegle v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Cooper v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.