Legal Opinion

In Re Blaney

California Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1947No. Crim. 4733PublishedCited by 97 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Prior to the commencement of this proceeding, one H. C. Ramser, doing business as the Upholstery Supply Company, hereinafter referred to as Ramser, prosecuted an action for damages and injunctive relief in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County against various labor unions, W. T. Blaney, a member and business representative of Van Storage and Furniture Drivers, Packers and Helper’s Local Union No. 389 (hereinafter referred to as Van Storage Union), one of the unions. Various business firms who employed labor, and who were either suppliers, carriers or customers of Ramser (hereinafter…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by97 opinions

  1. Fort v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. American Academy of Pediatrics v. LungrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Gregory v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In re BerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. People v. HofsheierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API