Legal Opinion
Cooper v. State Board of Equalization
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 9, 1955No. Civ. 16706PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Cooper and Sanchez, as the licensees, owners and operators of a bar in San Francisco, were duly charged by the State Board of Equalization, the body then having constitutional authority to enforce the terms of the Alcoholic Beverage Act, with having violated sections 24200 and 25657 of the Business and Professions Code, and Penal Code, section 303. The hearing officer found that the charged offenses had been committed and recommended revocation of the license. The board approved this recommendation, and ordered the license revoked. The petitioners, thereupon, sought a writ of mandate in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Covert v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Golceff v. SugarmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Cornell v. ReillyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Mantzoros v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Schaub's Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Endo v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. FrangadakisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Brodsky v. California State Board of PharmacyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Morell v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.