Legal Opinion

Bernal v. Loeks

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 16, 2000No. 2 CA-CV 99-0107PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRAMMER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Arthur Bernal appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants/appellees Ronald and Donna Loeks and Gary and Kerry McCusker on his claim that they had unlawfully denied him access to rights-of-way that had been reserved on their properties in federal land patents. We reverse.

Facts and Procedural History

¶ 2 We view the facts in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was entered. United Bank of Arizona v. Allyn, 167 Ariz. 191, 805 P.2d 1012 (App.1990). Bernal and his neighbors the Loekses…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State, Department of Highways v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State, Department of Highways v. CrosbyAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Tanner Companies v. Arizona State Land DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. State v. Alaska Land Title Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Las Vegas v. Cliff Shadows Professional Plaza, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Neal v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Neal v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Neal v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Todd Underwood v. Thomas Wilczynski and Dana Wilczynski Janet A. Bewley...Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API