Neal v. Brown
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1DissentSnow, Judge
¶ 24 My colleagues in the majority create a new rule governing express easements reserved in federal land patents that changes the settled law. Because I believe the majority’s new rule misreads the actual language of the patent, misapplies existing law, fails to serve the purposes of the Small Tract Act, 43 U.S.C. § 682a (repealed 1976) (“STA” or “the Act”),4 and will work mischief with every tract of land that contains an STA reservation, I dissent.
¶ 25 The property at issue in this appeal is located on what is now East Skinner Drive in Cave Creek east of 56th Street between Dixileta Drive…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hyland v. FondaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Squaw Peak Community Covenant Church v. Anozira Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Hunt v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- City of Phoenix v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.