Legal Opinion · Dissent

Neal v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 8, 2008No. 1 CA-CV 06-0756Published

1DissentSnow, Judge

¶ 24 My colleagues in the majority create a new rule governing express easements reserved in federal land patents that changes the settled law. Because I believe the majority’s new rule misreads the actual language of the patent, misapplies existing law, fails to serve the purposes of the Small Tract Act, 43 U.S.C. § 682a (repealed 1976) (“STA” or “the Act”),4 and will work mischief with every tract of land that contains an STA reservation, I dissent.

¶ 25 The property at issue in this appeal is located on what is now East Skinner Drive in Cave Creek east of 56th Street between Dixileta Drive…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hyland v. FondaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. Squaw Peak Community Covenant Church v. Anozira Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  3. Hunt v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. City of Phoenix v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API