Legal Opinion
State, Department of Highways v. Crosby
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided February 3, 1966No. 584PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, Justice.
The appellees own real property which their grantor obtained by patent from the United States. The patent provided that the grant of the property was subject to
[ T]he reservation of a right-of-way for roads, roadways, highways, tramways, trails, bridges, and appurtenant structures constructed or to be constructed by or under authority of the United States or by any State created out of the Territory of Alaska, in accordance with the act of July 24, 1947 (61 Stat., 418, 48 U.S.C. sec. 321d).
By virtue of the foregoing reservation, the state claimed a right-of-way for highway…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Myers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Black River Regulating District v. Adirondack League ClubNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- John Zwack, Bela Zwack and Dora Zwack, as Co-Partners Doing Business as J. Zwack & Company v. Kraus Bros. & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Bourdieu v. Pacific Western Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Commercial State Bank of Roseville v. GidneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- State, Department of Highways v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Anchorage v. McCabeAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Wessells v. State, Department of HighwaysAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1969
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.