Legal Opinion

Fullerton v. McCord

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 21, 1999No. 99-306PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENSKI R. SMITH, Justice.

Appellant, S. Baker Fullerton, III, attempts ice. extradition to Tennessee, and appeals the circuit court’s denial of his Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Fullerton alleges two errors in the extradition proceedings. First, he asserts the court erred because he is not the person identified in the extradition documents. Second, he asserts that he cannot be a fugitive because he was not in Tennessee at the time of the alleged crime. Appellant’s contentions are without merit, and we affirm.

Facts

In April 1997, Graves Chrysler of Gibson County, Tennessee (“Graves”),…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Appleyard v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. California v. Superior Court of Cal., San Bernardino Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Steggall Ex Rel. Stegall v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  5. Gulley, Sheriff v. AppleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carter v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Farmers Home Mutual Fire Insurance v. Bank of PocahontasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Smith v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  4. Grissom v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Burton v. Mumford, WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API