Legal Opinion
Steggall Ex Rel. Stegall v. Morris
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided June 8, 1953No. 43436PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESTHUES, C.
Plaintiffs, Darwin and Barbara Steggall, are husband and wife. Being under 21 years of age, they filed this suit by a guardian, Maurice Steggall, appointed for that purpose, The suit was based on Section 537.080, RSMo 1949, YAMS. /Plaintiffs. [578] seek-$15,000 as damages for the wrongful death of their son. ■ -
It -was alleged in the petition that on May'2, .1952, Barbara Steggall was driving a ear on the streets of Lancaster, Missouri; that the defendant,. Sam Morris, was at the time driving a car and failed to observe a “STOP” sign; that he was negligent in ■permitting his car…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Woods v. LancetNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Dietrich v. Inhabitants of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Verkennes v. CornieaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Cummins v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Allaire v. St. Luke's HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Sours v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Smith v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Mitchell v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
- O'GRADY v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.