Farmers Home Mutual Fire Insurance v. Bank of Pocahontas
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Tom Glaze, Justice.
Appellant Farmers Home Mutual Fire Insurance Company (“Farmers”) has petitioned for review from a court of appeals opinion affirming the trial court’s ruling in favor of the appellee Bank ofPocahontas (“the Bank”). We are asked to interpret the phrase “on demand” in a standard mortgage clause in a home insurance policy.
The facts are as follows: Donna Hawkins obtained a mortgage loan from the Bank in order to purchase a home. The Bank approved the loan and issued a standard real estate mortgage that required an insurance policy naming the Bank as loss payee. Hawkins obtained…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Elam v. First Unum Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Norris Ex Rel. Thomas v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. EllisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Marcum v. WengertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Valley v. Phillips County Election CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Design Professionals Insurance Company v. Chicago Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Valley Ex Rel. Anderson v. National Zinc Processors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Newton v. TiddCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.