Legal Opinion

Farmers Home Mutual Fire Insurance v. Bank of Pocahontas

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 20, 2003No. 03-408PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Appellant Farmers Home Mutual Fire Insurance Company (“Farmers”) has petitioned for review from a court of appeals opinion affirming the trial court’s ruling in favor of the appellee Bank ofPocahontas (“the Bank”). We are asked to interpret the phrase “on demand” in a standard mortgage clause in a home insurance policy.

The facts are as follows: Donna Hawkins obtained a mortgage loan from the Bank in order to purchase a home. The Bank approved the loan and issued a standard real estate mortgage that required an insurance policy naming the Bank as loss payee. Hawkins obtained…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Elam v. First Unum Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Norris Ex Rel. Thomas v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. EllisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Marcum v. WengertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Valley v. Phillips County Election CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  2. Design Professionals Insurance Company v. Chicago Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  3. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Valley Ex Rel. Anderson v. National Zinc Processors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Newton v. TiddCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API