Legal Opinion

California v. Superior Court of Cal., San Bernardino Cty.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 9, 1987No. 86-381PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

At issue in this case are the limits imposed by federal law upon state court habeas corpus proceedings challenging an extradition warrant.

I

Richard and Judith Smolin were divorced in California in 1978. Sole custody of their two children, Jennifer and Jamie, was awarded to Judith Smolin, subject to reasonable visitation rights for Richard. Until November 1979, all the parties remained in San Bernardino County, California, and Richard apparently paid his child support and exercised his visitation rights without serious incident. In August 1979, however, Judith married James Pope, and in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Commonwealth of Ky. v. DENNISON, GOVERNOR, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1861
  4. Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  5. Biddinger v. Commissioner of Police of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Printz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Puerto Rico v. BranstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. State Ex Rel. Holmes v. KlevenhagenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Harold E. Sivard, Jr. v. Pulaski County, Pulaski County Sheriff's Department, Charlotte Ward-Tillett, Individually and in Her Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API