Legal Opinion

Faulkenbury v. Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement System

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1999No. COA98-874PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENE, Judge.

Dorothy M. Faulkenbury, et al., William H. Woodard, et al., Bonnie G. Peele, et al., and Ralph R. Hailey, Jr., et al. (collectively, Plaintiffs) appeal from the trial court’s Order on Calculation of Interest allowing the Teachers’ and State Employees’ Retirement System of North Carolina, et al. and the North Carolina Local Governmental Employees’ Retirement System, et al. (collectively, Defendants) to calculate “back benefits or underpayments due [Plaintiffs] in the same manner in which [Defendants have] traditionally.”

This appeal is the seventh in a long progeny of appeals…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Faulkenbury v. Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Watson Industries, Inc. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Faulkenbury v. TEACHERS'AND STATE EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEMCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Woodard v. North Carolina Local Governmental Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority v. Sumner Hills Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Probst v. STATE DEPT. OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Probst ex rel. Class of Similarly Situated Individuals v. Department of Retirement SystemsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API