Watson Industries, Inc. v. Shaw
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, J.
The plaintiff properly sets forth in its complaint two separate and distinct causes of action: (1) for the recovery of the alleged excess amount paid on the parts purchased for the construction of the four radio towers, and (2) for the recovery of the taxes paid on the rentals for transcriptions. This serves to clarify and facilitate discussion of the questions of law raised by the appeals herein.
Fibst Cause oe ActioN.
Are the fabricated articles or parts purchased by plaintiff for use in the erection of four radio towers building material within the meaning of G.S. 105-187? If so, plaintiff…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Henneford v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- McLeod v. J. E. Dilworth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Helson & Randolph v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Kent Stahle v. CTS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Jolly v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Appeal of Clayton-Marcus Company, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.