Legal Opinion
Probst ex rel. Class of Similarly Situated Individuals v. Department of Retirement Systems
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided March 13, 2012No. 40861-9-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWorswick, J.
¶1 Mickey and Leisa Fowler are class representatives for plaintiffs who are members of the Teachers’ Retirement System (TRS) and who transferred from TRS Plan 2 to TRS Plan 3 before January 20, 2002. The superior court dismissed their claim that the Department of Retirement Systems (DRS) was required to pay class members daily interest on the full balance of employee contributions transferred between Plan 2 and Plan 3. The *183Fowlers appeal, arguing that (1) common law required the DRS to pay daily interest, (2) the DRS’s failure to pay daily interest was arbitrary and capricious, and (3) the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Bostain v. Food Express, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Probst v. STATE DEPT. OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State of Washington v. Armando Cortez LopezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014