Legal Opinion

Probst v. STATE DEPT. OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 13, 2012No. 40861-9-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

271 P.3d 966 (2012)

167 Wn. App. 180

Jeffrey PROBST and a class of similarly situated individuals; and Mickey Fowler and Leisa Fowler, and a class of similarly situated individuals, Appellants,

v.

Washington STATE DEPARTMENT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS, Respondents.

No. 40861-9-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

March 13, 2012.

Stephen Kirk Festor, Stephen Kolden Strong, Bendich Stobaugh & Strong PC, Catherine Wright Smith, Smith Goodfriend PS, Seattle, WA, for Appellants.

Sarah Elizabeth Blocki, Attorney at Law, Olympia, WA, Timothy J. Filer, Samuel T. Bull, Foster Pepper PLLC, Seattle, WA,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Bostain v. Food Express, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mickey Fowler v. Tracy GuerinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States Mission Corp. v. KIRO TV, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Mickey Fowler v. Tracy GuerinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Dana Rush V. State Of Washington Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2026
  5. Fowler v. GuerinWashington Supreme Court · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API