Legal Opinion
Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority v. Sumner Hills Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided April 6, 2001No. 86PA00PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Justice.
Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority (the Water Authority) is a public authority organized pursuant to Article 1 of Chapter 162A of the General Statutes. See N.C.G.S. §§ 162A-1 to -19 (1999). The Water Authority is vested with the power of eminent domain under N.C.G.S. § 162A-6.
On 24 February 1998 the Water Authority filed a complaint, declaration of taking and notice of deposit (the complaint) to condemn property for the Randleman Dam and Lake water supply project (the Project) in Guilford and Randolph Counties. The property at issue, an approximately 145-acre tract owned…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Cincinnati v. Vester. Same v. Richards Same v. ReakirtSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Palazzolo v. State Ex Rel. TavaresSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- City of Charlotte v. HeathSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- City of Norwood v. HorneyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Hart v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
- State ex rel. McCrory v. BergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
- Cooper v. BergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.