Boomer v. Abbett
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
This action, tried by the court without a jury, grew out of a subcontract entered into by plaintiff copartnership with defendant Abbett under a prime contract between said Abbett and the United States Bureau of Reclamation. The prime contract was to construct a transmission line in northern California. The subcontract was to perform the excavation for and installation of the transmission line towers and certain other work.
Question Presented
Mainly, whether the excavation of the eight tower sites in the “dredger tailings” area was included in the prime contract and the subcontract.
Facts
The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McConnell v. Corona City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Hensler v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Monson v. FischerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Brown v. CoffeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Ries v. ReinardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Russ v. RussCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Stroman v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962