Legal Opinion
Brown v. Coffee
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 7, 1911No. Civ. No. 1010PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action to recover $967.87, an alleged balance due on account. The complaint avers that plaintiff, at the special instance and request of defendant, performed work and labor and furnished materials in doing sundry carpenter work, the reasonable value of which was $1,467.87, upon which defendant paid the sum of $500. The answer denied the material allegations of the complaint, but admitted the existence of a balance due to plaintiff of $369. Judgment went for plaintiff in the sum of $809.73 and costs, from which defendant appeals.
As disclosed by the record, defendant was fitting up a storeroom…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gerrish v. MaherIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Haubert v. MausshardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Lawrence v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hensler v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Monson v. FischerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Ehrenreich v. SheltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Colley v. Chowchilla National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Rossi v. Beaulieu VineyardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.