Ries v. Reinard
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of defendant after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover damages for alleged malpractice, plaintiffs appeal.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to defendant (respondent), the essential facts are:
On December 19, 1938, plaintiff Ruth Ries consulted defendant, a physician and surgeon, relative to an itching in the region of her vagina. After taking said plaintiff’s history, defendant made a smear from the vagina, urethra, and cervix, and, after a microscopic examination of the smear (known as the methylene blue test) told plaintiff…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Engelking v. CarlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Reed v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Matthiesen v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Huffman v. LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Lewis & Queen v. S. Edmondson & SonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Waller v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Woods v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.