Legal Opinion

Hahn v. Curtis

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1946No. Civ. 7189PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

On November 16, 1943, appellant filed his first complaint in this action, and on July 18, 1944, filed his first amended complaint. He alleged therein that he was the owner of certain described lands which were contiguous for a distance of one-fourth mile to lands owned by defendant; that near the dividing line, but upon defendant’s land, there was a natural ridge of land that directed the flow of surface waters northeast, away from plaintiff’s land, but that defendant, prior to 1942, had caused or permitted a ditch to be dug through said ridge, which said ditch she had, in 1941 or 1942,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Austin & Northwestern Railway Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Learned v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. People v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Wood v. MoultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zimmer v. DykstraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. McInnish v. SibitOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Jones v. HarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Thorstrom v. ThorstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Reinsch v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API