Legal Opinion
In Re Dixon
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 10, 1932No. Docket No. 8236PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMISON, J., pro tem.
This appeal is from a judgment in favor of respondents upon a petition to have certain lands, alleged to be owned by them, registered under the Land Registration Act commonly known as the Torrens Act.
The land sought to be registered by respondents is the north half of lot 67, and a portion of lot 78, San Gabriel Boulevard, Los Angeles County, California, as per map recorded in book 54, pages 71 and 72, miscellaneous records of said county. The only part thereof that is involved in this appeal is a strip 15 feet wide extending east and west across the south end of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allen v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Earl v. DutourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- San Francisco Credit Clearing House v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Montgomery v. HinesIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Thorpe v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Glatts v. HensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Mall, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Townsend v. KoukolMontana Supreme Court · 1966
- Stockdale v. LesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Allan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.