Legal Opinion

Harrold v. Harrold

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 1950No. Civ. 7730PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

Plaintiff, who was awarded an interlocutory decree of divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty, now challenges the financial provisions of the judgment and in particular the portion thereof providing for alimony and a division of the community property.

The record shows that the parties were married November 26, 1936, and first separated in the fall of 1944, at which time plaintiff instituted an action for separate maintenance and a division of the community property. However, the action did not proceed to trial and in June of the following year the parties entered into a separation agreement…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Soule v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Arnold v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Deyoe v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  4. Harrold v. HarroldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Anderson v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API