Legal Opinion
Kern v. United States Bureau of Land Management
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 6, 1999No. 98-6063-HOPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOGAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action under the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. (NEPA), the Federal Land Policy Management Act, 43 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq. (FLPMA), and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. (APA), challenging defendant the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) alleged failure to meet its procedural and substantive duties required by law. Plaintiffs allege that the BLM failed to adequately perform environmental review procedures regarding the environmental impacts posed by the introduction and spread of Phytophthora…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Conservation Congress v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Kern v. United States Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Wildlands CPR, Inc. v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2012
- Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Chattooga River Watershed Coalition v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.