Legal Opinion

Kern v. United States Bureau of Land Management

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 22, 2002No. 99-35254PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge W. FLETCHER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge GRABER.

WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Hugh Kern, Leigh Ann Lipscomb, and the Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund (collectively, “ONRC”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant United States Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) and defendants-intervenors Douglas Timber Operators, Herbert Lumber Co., and Lone Rock Timber Co. (collectively, “the timber companies”). ONRC’s suit involves BLM action in the Coos Bay District, a BLM district along the southwest coast of Oregon.

ONRC…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Native Ecosystems Council v. DombeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. California Ex Rel. Lockyer v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
  3. Arkansas Wildlife Federation v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2003
  5. Native Ecosystems Council v. Michael DombeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API