Legal Opinion
Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. LSI CORP.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 18, 2011No. C-11-2709 EMCPublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT AND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
(Docket Nos. 21, 45)
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs Barnes & Noble (“BN”) and Barnesandnoble.com (“BN.com”) have filed a declaratory judgment suit for non-infringement of eleven patents against Defendants Agere Systems, Inc. (“Agere”) and LSI Corp. (“LSI”). Defendants’ motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint (“Compl.”) and first amended complaint (“FAC”), Docket Nos. 21, 45, came on for hearing on October 7, 2011. Having considered the parties’ submissions and oral argument,…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- McGrath v. Home Depot USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Lax v. Toyota Motor Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Speedfit LLC v. Woodway USA, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- No Cost Conference, Inc. v. Windstream Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2013
- Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. LSI Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.