Legal Opinion
Fattibene v. Kealey
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 1, 1987No. 5139PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSatter, J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant rendered by the trial court after accepting the report of an attorney trial referee and from an order of the trial court imposing sanctions upon the plaintiff and his counsel.
The plaintiff alleged in a five count complaint that the defendant negligently repaired the transmission of the plaintiffs 1980 Audi and breached an express warranty as to the work. The case was referred to an attorney trial referee. After extensive hearings, the attorney referee found that the defendant’s warranty applied only to the transmission, and that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Robert Lawrence Associates, Inc. v. Del VecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Bowman v. 1477 Central Avenue Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Sasso v. AleshinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
3Cited by8 opinions
- CFM of Connecticut, Inc. v. ChowdhurySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Fattibene v. KealeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- John J. Fannon Co. v. Fannon Products, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Schultz v. BarkerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Friedman v. Town of WestportConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.