Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Barker
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 30, 1988No. 5744PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The plaintiff instituted this action seeking to enjoin the defendant from blocking a right-of-way over the defendant’s property which provides the plaintiff with access to her beachfront cottages. The defendant counterclaimed requesting that the court reform the deeds to both properties to show a right-of-way over the plaintiff’s property providing the defendant with access to the beach, enjoin the plaintiff from interfering with this right-of-way and award money damages.
The matter was heard by an attorney trial referee pursuant to General Statutes § 52-434 (a) (4). Upon issuance of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- McCahill v. Town & Country Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Rischall v. BauchmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- D'AMATO v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Simone Corporation v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pender v. MatrangaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Gemmell v. LeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Friedman v. Town of WestportConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Utay v. G.C.S. Realty, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Deane v. KahnConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.