Biren v. Equality Emergency Medical Group, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, P. J.
Five physicians create a business to provide emergency care in hospitals. The business consists of two corporations in which each physician is a corporate officer, director, and 20 percent shareholder.
This appeal involves a dispute between director, chief financial officer, and shareholder Pamela C. Biren, and the other four directors, officers, and shareholders. Here we conclude, among other things, that the business judgment rule may protect a director who acts in a mistaken but good faith belief on behalf of the corporation without obtaining required shareholder…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Xuereb v. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Scott Co. of California v. Blount, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Morey v. VannucciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Richard B. LeVine, Inc. v. HigashiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Wakefield v. BohlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Wind Dancer Production Group v. Walt Disney PicturesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Ritter & Ritter, Inc. Pension & Profit Plan v. the Churchill Condominium Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Preciado v. WildeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.