Legal Opinion
Ruggeri v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 13, 2008No. Civil 3:06cv1985 (JBA)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. #140] AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. # 141J1 1
JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Luann Ruggeri, Richard Jaramillo and Prakash Naik (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) initiated this suit against Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated (“Boehringer” or “Defendant”), their former employer, for relief from Defendant’s alleged misclassification of them as “exempt” employees resulting in its failure to pay them overtime wages, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Reich v. John Alden Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Alvarez v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hendricks v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Baum v. ASTRAZENECA LPDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Copello v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Kuzinski v. Schering Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- Schaefer-LaRose v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.