Legal Opinion

Schaefer-LaRose v. Eli Lilly and Co.

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided September 29, 2009No. 1:07-cv-1133-SEB-TABPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF SUSAN SCHAEFER-LAROSE

SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge.

This cause is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff, Susan Schaefer-LaRose [Docket No. 68], filed by Defendant, Eli Lilly and Company (“Lilly”), on December 17, 2007, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff, Susan Schaefer-LaRose, brings her claim against Lilly, her former employer, alleging that Lilly failed to provide her with overtime compensation, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schaefer-LaRose v. Eli Lilly & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Klein v. Torrey Point Group, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  3. Corman v. JWS of N.M., Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
  4. Jirak v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  5. Campanelli v. Hershey Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API