Legal Opinion
Baum v. ASTRAZENECA LP
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 31, 2009No. 2:07-cr-00090PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER
KIM R. GIBSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Kristin Baum seeks damages from Defendant AstraZeneca LP for alleged violations of Pennsylvania law that requires overtime pay for non-exempt employees. Ms. Baum, a pharmaceutical sales representative, argues that AstraZeneca improperly treated her position as exempt from Pennsylvania’s wage and hour laws. AstraZeneca disagrees, arguing that the job tasks performed by Ms. Baum fall within the statutory exemption for outside sales work. In addition to seeking resolution of her own claim, Ms. Baum also seeks to act as…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Flood v. Just Energy Mktg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Martin v. Sprint United Management Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Harris v. Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
- Ford v. Lehigh Valley Restaurant Group Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.