Legal Opinion
Copello v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 2, 2011No. 10 C 7396PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
GARY FEINERMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Catherine Copello filed this lawsuit against her former employer, Defendant Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., alleging that it wrongfully deprived her of overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the Illinois Minimum Wage Law (“IMWL”), 820 ILCS 105 et seq. For the IMWL claim, the complaint alleged that Copello could represent a class, to be certified under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, consisting of similarly situated Boehringer pharmaceutical sales representatives…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Barfield v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Akins v. Worley Catastrophe Response, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013
- Killion v. KeHE DistributorsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
- Heard v. Becton, Dickinson and CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
- Jean-Francois v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2023
- Lusk v. Serve U Brands, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.