Legal Opinion

Wohlschlegel v. Holst

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1959No. 8781PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Justice.

This is an action for damages for breach of contract. Plaintiff-respondent seeks to recover the purchase price of a pipeline milking machine installed on defendant-appellant’s dairy farm.

The appellant telephoned respondent during the latter part of August, 1958. He informed respondent he wished to install a new milkline — a device by which milk is taken from dairy cows by mechanical means and conducted to containers without intervention of human hands. The parties disagree as to what was said in this telephone conversation. The appellant maintains he specified “a Chore Boy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Molyneux v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Wood River Power Co. v. ArkooshIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Fullmer v. ProctorIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Spokane Cattle Loan Co. v. Crane Creek Sheep Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Rudeen v. HowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rogers v. HendrixIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Transamerica Leasing Corp. v. Van's Realty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Boesiger v. DeModenaIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Kilbourne-Park Corporation v. BuckinghamWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Rogers v. HendrixIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API