Legal Opinion

Wood River Power Co. v. Arkoosh

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1923PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

G-IVENSy Commissioner.

— This action was brought by respondent, the Wood River Power Company, a corporation, to restrain appellants, Corjia Arkoosh and S. J. Arkoosh, from changing the point of diversion of certain water belonging to the appellant Corjia Arkoosh from respondent’s tail-race to respondent’s forebay, and also from diverting any water with the exception of ten inches from respondent’s forebay.

Appellant Corjia Arkoosh by answer and cross-complaint claimed by prescription and grant an easement in the canal and storage reservoir of the respondent, and the right to convey 160 inches…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burke Land & Livestock Co. v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Neil v. HydeIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Schurger v. MoormanIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Spongberg v. First National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Werry v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Interform Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Silver Syndicate, Inc. v. Sunshine Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Molyneux v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Rogers v. HendrixIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API