Legal Opinion

Kilbourne-Park Corporation v. Buckingham

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1965No. 3391PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harnsberger

Plaintiff sought recovery of an alleged balance due under a contract with defendant. Upon trial to the court, judgment was for plaintiff and defendant appeals.

The contract prepared by defendant’s attorney required that plaintiff, for the sum of $8,500, would complete all roadways as platted in the Ponderosa Subdivision.

Plaintiff proceeded to build roads upon subdivided lands belonging to defendant, and from time to time received payments from defendant as the work progressed until there remained an unpaid balance of some $3,000 which defendant refused to pay, claiming that all the roads…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Earle v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Goodman v. KellyWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Earle v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942
  4. In Re Gotham Silver Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
  5. Yellowstone Sheep Co. v. Diamond Dot Live Stock Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bulis v. WellsWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Busch Development, Inc. v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PaulsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API