Legal Opinion
John Watkins v. Ameripride Services, Dba Ameripride Uniform Services
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 6, 2004No. 02-56082PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge RAWLINSON. Concurrence by Judge WILLIAM A. FLETCHER.
RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellant John Watkins (Watkins) unfortunately became disabled during his otherwise productive stint as an employee with Defendant-Appellee Ameri-pride Services (Ameripride). Ameripride tried to salvage Watkins’ career by placing him on special assignment and on a leave of absence. However, Watkins was unable to recover sufficiently to resume his former position. Watkins sued Ameripride under the California Labor Code for improperly classifying him as exempt from overtime pay and thus…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Robin Fortyune v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Lolli v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Jensen v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Burnside v. Kiewit Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- The State of Idaho Potato Commission v. G & T Terminal Packaging, Inc., the State of Idaho Potato Commission v. G & T Terminal Packaging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Cicairos v. Summit Logistics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Wilson v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Alexia Herrera v. Zumiez, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.