Legal Opinion

Robin Fortyune v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 14, 2004No. 02-57013PublishedCited by 404 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:

Robin Fortyune is a C-5 quadriplegic who requires both a wheelchair and an aide to attend movie theaters. Fortyune and his wife Felicia attempted to view American Multi-Cinema’s (“AMC”) screening of the film Chicken Run, but were prevented from doing so when a man and his son refused to vacate the wheelchair “companion seats” that they occupied. AMC’s manager informed the Fortyunes that, under company policy concerning the use of wheelchair companion seats at sold-out screenings, he could not require the man and his son to change seats. Spurned and publicly humiliated,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by404 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Richard McGary v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. Halpern v. Wake Forest University Health SciencesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  5. D'LIL v. Best Western Encina Lodge & SuitesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

399 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API