Legal Opinion
Lord Family of Windsor, LLC v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 21, 2007No. AC 27906PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BISHOP, J.
This case addresses whether the stated concerns and apprehensions of an inland wetlands agency amount to substantial evidence sufficient to uphold the agency’s denial of an application to modify a subdivision plan. The plaintiffs, the Lord Family of Windsor, LLC, and Robert Daddario, appeal from the trial court’s judgment denying their appeal from the decision of the defendant inland wetlands and watercourses commission of the town of Windsor (commission), 1 which had rejected the plaintiffs’ application to modify a proposed and previously approved subdivision plan. We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- River Bend Associates, Inc. v. Conservation & Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lord Family of Windsor, LLC v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Martland v. Zoning Com'n of Town of WoodburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Lord Family of Windsor, LLC. v. Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Commission of the Town of WindsorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007