Legal Opinion
Speckmann v. Paddock Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided June 21, 1983No. 82-0888-C(C)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
565 F.Supp. 469 (1983)
Fred R. SPECKMANN, Clarence F. Hanneken, R. Bruce Wynne, Edgar M. Hayward, Monsignor Carl C. Poelker, in their representative capacity as Trustees of the District No. 9, I.A.M.A.W. Pension Plan, Plaintiffs,
v.
PADDOCK CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH, INC., a Missouri corporation, Defendant.
No. 82-0888-C(C).
United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D.
May 6, 1983.
Modified Opinion on Motions for Summary Judgment May 31, 1983.
Opinion on Motion for Modification of Judgment June 21, 1983.
Cary Hammond, Clayton, Mo., for plaintiffs.
Gerald Tockman, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.
MEMORANDUM
MER…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Andrus v. AllardSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Combs v. Adkins & Adkins Coal Co., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- I.A.M. National Pension Fund v. Clinton Engines Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Banner Industries, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- I.A.M. National Pension Fund, Plan A, a Benefits v. Clinton Engines Corporation, (Two Cases). I.A.M. National Pension Fund, Benefit Plan a v. Cooper Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.