Legal Opinion
Banner Industries, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 25, 1987No. 86 C 3046PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PLUNKETT, District Judge.
Banner Industries, Inc. (“Banner”) brought this action against, among others, Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund (“Central States”), seeking a declaratory judgment that Banner is not liable to Central States for any portion of a demand for withdrawal liability 1 in the amount of $19,808,781.43 made against Banner by Central States pursuant to § 4202 of the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (“MPPAA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1382. The dispute currently before this court requires us to review Count I of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Andrew Powe v. The City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. Barker & Williamson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Republic Industries, Inc. v. Teamsters Joint Council No. 83 of Virginia Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Flying Tiger Line v. Teamsters Pension Trust FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- The Flying Tiger Line, a Delaware Corporation, Tiger International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Warren Transport, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, & Counterdefendants v. Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity, A/K/A Teamsters Pension Plan of Philadelphia and Vicinity, and Charles J. Schaffer, Jr., Counterplaintiffs v. Central States, Southwest and Southeast Areas Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Western Pennsylvania Teamsters and Employers Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Teamsters Local 641 Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, and Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Each Sued Individually and as a Member of a Class of Similarly Situated Multiemployer Pension Plans Who Assert Withdrawal Liability, Against Hall's Motor Transit Company, Under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980. Appeal of the Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Tiger International Inc. And Warren Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers and Warehouse Workers Union (Independent) Pension Fund and Paul Glover v. Louis Zahn Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Straus v. DVC Worldwide, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- The Mason And Dixon Tank Lines, Inc. v. Central States, Southeast And Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.