I.A.M. National Pension Fund, Plan A, a Benefits v. Clinton Engines Corporation, (Two Cases). I.A.M. National Pension Fund, Benefit Plan a v. Cooper Industries, Inc
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
825 F.2d 415
263 U.S.App.D.C. 278, 56 USLW 2093,
8 Employee Benefits Ca 2089
I.A.M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND, PLAN A, A BENEFITS, et al.
v.
CLINTON ENGINES CORPORATION, Appellant (Two Cases).
I.A.M. NATIONAL PENSION FUND, BENEFIT PLAN A, et al., Appellants
v.
COOPER INDUSTRIES, INC.
86-5304, 86-7015.
United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued March 31, 1987.
Decided July 28, 1987.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Civil Action No. 85-02877).
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Civil Action No. 84-03346).
Ja…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Helen Debreceni, Etc. v. Merchants Terminal Corporation and Terminal Refrigeration and Warehousing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Flying Tiger Line v. Teamsters Pension Trust FundCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- The Flying Tiger Line, a Delaware Corporation, Tiger International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Warren Transport, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, & Counterdefendants v. Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity, A/K/A Teamsters Pension Plan of Philadelphia and Vicinity, and Charles J. Schaffer, Jr., Counterplaintiffs v. Central States, Southwest and Southeast Areas Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Western Pennsylvania Teamsters and Employers Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Teamsters Local 641 Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, and Central Pennsylvania Teamsters Pension Fund, a Multiemployer Pension Plan, Each Sued Individually and as a Member of a Class of Similarly Situated Multiemployer Pension Plans Who Assert Withdrawal Liability, Against Hall's Motor Transit Company, Under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980. Appeal of the Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Tiger International Inc. And Warren Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- National Shopmen Pension Fund v. DisaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers and Warehouse Workers Union (Independent) Pension Fund and Paul Glover v. Louis Zahn Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.