Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
In Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. R. A. Gray & Co., 467 U. S. 717 (1984), the Court held that retroactive application of the withdrawal liability provisions of the Multi-employer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. In these cases, we address the question whether the withdrawal liability provisions of the Act are valid under the Clause of the Fifth Amendment that forbids the taking of private property for public use without just compensation.
I
A
The background and legislative history of both the Employee Retirement Income…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by675 opinions
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corp. of California, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
670 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.