Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Ronan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 2010No. 2010-0217PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment denying a request for attorney fees in a public-records mandamus case. Because the court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in denying the request, we affirm the judgment.

Facts

{¶ 2} On February 5, 2009, a reporter for appellant, the Cincinnati Enquirer, a division of Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc., requested all documents submitted by prospective candidates for the superintendent position of the Cincinnati Public Schools. Applicants for the superintendent position submitted materials to a post office box leased by the school district.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tax Analysts v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  2. Kish v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State ex rel. Pennington v. GundlerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Seneca County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State ex rel. Mazzaro v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Miller v. Ohio Dept. of Edn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Narciso v. Powell Police Dept.Ohio Court of Claims · 2018
  3. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Claims · 2020
  4. Doe v. Ohio State Univ.Ohio Court of Claims · 2024
  5. Brown v. ClevelandOhio Court of Claims · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API