Legal Opinion

Adrian C. Eichman v. Fotomat Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 10, 1985No. 82-5404PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1436FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:

This case is before us on appeal from the district court’s dismissal of Eichman’s lawsuit on the ground that Eichman’s claims were barred by the res judicata effect of an earlier state suit. Because California preclusion law includes the requirement of prior jurisdictional competency, under Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 1327, 84 L.Ed.2d 274 (1985), we find that Eichman is not precluded from bringing a federal action when the state court had no jurisdiction to hear Eichman’s federal claims. We therefore reverse the district…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Agarwal v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Nano Maldonado v. Tony Harris, in His Capacity as Acting Director of the California Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Jeremiah W. Holder v. Carla R. Holder, Jeremiah W. Holder v. Carla R. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Sosa v. DIRECTV, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Peterson v. Highland Music, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Howard v. America Online Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API