Legal Opinion
Brodheim v. Cry
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 28, 2009No. 07-17081PublishedCited by 964 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge LARSON; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BEA.
LARSON, District Judge:
Michael Brodheim, a prisoner at the California Medical Facility (“CMF”), appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment against him on his claim that his First Amendment right to petition the government for redress of grievances was violated by defendant Michael Cry, the prison Appeals Coordinator. The claimed violation occurred when a prison official denied Brodheim’s written “interview request,” and noted on the denial that Brodheim should be “careful” what he writes and requests in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rhodes v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Lee Max Barnett v. Helen Centoni, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State Prison S. Donahue, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by964 opinions
- Raymond Watison v. Mary CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Patrick Booker v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Clarence Jones v. Max WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Watkins v. KasperCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- James McBride v. S. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
959 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.