Legal Opinion

State v. Dowling

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

When arraigned, Dowling, without being represented by counsel or requesting such representation, pleaded guilty. There is no proof or showing whatsoever in the record that Dowling was lacking in intelligence or mental capacity, or that he did not fully understand and appreciate the nature of the offense charged and the effect of his plea of guilty.

Before imposing sentence, the court, on its motion, took the matter under advisement for a period of four days. On the adjourned day counsel appeared for Dowling and made a motion for dismissal on the ground that no venue is shown in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re CarlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. S. A. L.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mueller v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. PayneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Wilson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. La Fave v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. DeVougas v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API